He is fixing some of the fraud at least.
If democrats don’t take fraud seriously then people will want someone who will. We need a more logical democrat who takes tax dollars seriously, to efficiently distribute the money to those who need it and cut down on waste to optimize tangible value.
You need to journey to Epstein’s island to find Bill Gates to discover the secret.
I think it was when the gold standard ended, and poverty was rampant as all the debt unwound. Black unemployment was 30%.
The problem I think is these are drug addicts.
How do you safely maintain the housing, what do the contractors do when they’re doing meth as the pipes are flooding?
Its like taking care of violent mentally handicapped adults, or like pitbulls.
Just as Trump wanted. The military industrial complex has convinced the left wing to buy weapons.
It was going to be used as justification to confiscate guns, now it won’t be. I can understand a right leaning person being happy they were trans.
The president can impose tariffs if imports threaten national security. He cited fentanyl, and therefore its a tiny threat, which its not stipulated how severe it need to be.
I realize you are probably a child, but ask gemini to summarize this for you.
https://www.banqueducanada.ca/2025/05/document-analyse-personnel-2025-8/
Citation?
It wasnt hat long ago they peddled the labor shortage lie. Which is a lie due to the Phillips curve, and the Bank of Canada actively cooling inflation by quickly jacking up rates which would quickly normalize the job market. Leading to the double digit youth unemployment.
https://www.ndp.ca/news/ndp-critic-immigration-calls-out-conservative-leader-harmful-policies
Well I disagree with handing a private corporation money at all, especially when were borrowing to do so, and need that money for social housing.
Wasn’t it billions of dollars?
They didn’t vote non-confidence, so they supported it.
They did push totally unfunded dental care and not much else. Future austerity essentially.
Why do we let Alaskan tankers go through then?
The problem is the Liberals put no clause in to deal with this situation. They cant retroactively make a law against their own stupidity for signing a bad contract, the best they can do is arbitrarily punish them, sending the signal we operate our country not by laws but like North Korea. Companies would need to factor that into their risk metrics.
Well the Liberals and NDP tripled immigration citing a labor shortage when we finally had some wage pressure due to the inflation. When the progressive is an arsonist the child with the lighter doesn’t seem so bad.
Rent control is a first mover advantage, its largely immigration and nimbys. They need to continue to shrink the population, but I don’t think they will.
Or they vote Con because Carney won’t fix housing, and has a new housing minister that immediately said housing prices can’t fall as its boomers retirement fund.
Liberals attempt to straddle the vote, they pretend to care about climate change for the youth vote, as they mass immigrate people into massive urban sprawl for the boomer vote. They straddle the conservative talking points about fiscal discipline as they leapfrog Trudeau level deficits.
He almost won if not for Trump.
What will the debate look like, he can just point to Sean Fraser and Gregor Robinson, what will a progressive say to that?
Vanicity credit Union cares more about affordable housing then our own federal government.
Did they clear up those China allegations?
Do they need to provide a back door?