If they’re breaching a house they’re going to be bringing long guns.

unless the owner in this case is shooting guns in their house

Do you not?

The kettling guide is 15+ years old and contains a phish to some Thai sex website.

This needs like 500 asterisks; being a criminal defense attorney is a profession that takes many years to do well, and can’t be summed up in a concise list.

I know it’s fun to use hyperbole on the internet when points are at stake, but in no universe is this a “pile of shit.”

It’s mediocre at worst, and you should check your feelings at the door.

Are you joking?

99% of comics don’t have debate in them, dude. Why do you think hers need it?

I voted for him in the primaries but I’m not stupid enough to stay home to allow Trump to be president out of spite.

Nobody’s going to be smug when they start shipping people off to death camps.

So… every popular comic then?

Also how are you going into comics expecting a “debate?” It’s a one way visual medium. Do you expect to debate a movie when you watch one?

Okay so you just have no sense of humor, if you think most popular comics are humorless.

Given how froth at the mouth angry you seem to be about this, while your stated position is certainly possible for someone to have, it’s way more likely you’re simply lying.

Just look at how you’ve straw manned my position by bringing up identity politics. You’re either arguing in bad faith because you’re very angry or because you never had a good faith opinion about her comics in the first place.

What gave you that idea?

Your statement makes no sense unless you’re stretching definitions to a comical degree.

Yeah anyone saying her comics are unfunny is lying to themself or others.

They’re not gut-busting, side-splitting, laugh out loud funny, but what comic is?

They’re slightly amusing, and more relevant in this case, often politically topical. The latter gets a lot of people very angry.

It doesn’t suck.

It’s no better or worse than similar comics, you just hate the creator.

That’s correct.

Yeah to me this fits under “a good chance but we’ll probably never know for sure.”

Of note is that the video came from right aligned news, so the odds of a malicious edit are very low.

Degenerates.

Oh we’re going to play that game? Fine:

Where did I say voting was the only political action you can take?

Arguing that it’s a false dichotomy makes me think you don’t actually care, you’re just trying to win an internet argument.

I’m not arguing that it’s a false dichotomy any more than I’m arguing that the Earth is a planet. I can point it out, but you can just as easily simply shut your eyes and plug your ears.

If you don’t know that what you said was a false dichotomy (or more accurately, refuse to confirm it by doing a quick web search for what the term means), that’s on you.

If you think someone pointing out a logical fallacy you made means “they’re just trying to win an internet argument,” that’s on you. It sounds like you’re extremely resistant to constructive criticism, which is a personal growth issue you should probably take a hard look at.

I’m not your teacher and I’m not your dad. You either care that you’re making critics of police look stupid or you don’t.

It’s been all over the news in recent weeks that ICE outright executed people in the street.

True and completely immaterial to this discussion no matter how times you keep Red Herring bringing it up.

And it’s commonly known that police in this country shoot first and ask questions later as policy.

A blatant lie. Can you point out a single agency in the US that has such a policy?

I can only assume you think we can reform the police in it’s current form (which is not true),

It’s a lot closer to true than what you’ve been saying.

You think that if someone points out a mistake you should double-down and be proud?

Who are you, Donald Trump?

Your use of a false dichotomy is not an opinion, it’s a fact. Having an opinion about a fact just means you’re confused.

If I said there are no shoes other than boots and sandals and you disagreed, that doesn’t make my “opinion” equally valid and worthy of respect, it just means I’m confused.

Do you know what a “false dichotomy” is? What you said doesn’t address that.

Here’s an example:

“The only types of footwear are boots and sandals.”

“That’s a false dichotomy; people can wear other shoe types.”

“I don’t think so, people wear boots all the time.”