He had to watch his daughter die right in front of him, because he fumbled a weapon that was supposed to keep them safe. Idk how anyone can see that as inconsequential.

Because if he wanted to kill her then that’s not a consequence, it’s a reward. If only there was some sort of trial in which evidence could be presented to an impartial judge…

that absolutely matters as the jury decides whether it is murder or manslaughter.

Ideally, yes. In this case there was no trial for the jury to make such a determination.

First post: “this doesn’t have a source to the real story.” (Does not provide a source)

This post: completely fabricated story to try to excuse what “may” have happened.

Your only defense is saying “The GJ decided not to.”

Yes, we know. That is what people are complaining about.

Your posts literally read as “you can’t complain that the GJ decided not to move forward because the GJ decided not to move forward.”

Oh well then, in that case nothing problematic happened at all!

The prosecutor can present evidence to the GJ selectively.

Yup

If there’s not enough selectively revealed evidence to convince a GJ

You’re so close to seeing the issue here.

Schrodinger’s Source: if they do not provide a source then any source you provide is ‘biased’ and incorrect. They have a source with a ‘true account’ but you have to find it on your own.

And we aren’t allowed to question if the grand jury made a mistake? If so everything else being discussed is pointless.

Do you think the situation you are describing sounds like it might be manslaughter? Enough that it is worth while to have a trial and find out?

I find it baffling when I go through a chain of comments with people complaining that the source is missing which provides context, but they don’t link the source.

“Don’t trust what people say happened if they don’t have a source. You can trust what I say happened without a source.”

Dad asks kid if they want to see a gun, kid says sure

From an article another user posted:

She said Lucy was “categorically anti-gun” and was worried about there being a firearm in the house with her two younger half-sisters.

“I’m very anti-gun and cutting my trip short due to a fight we had, but sure, I’d love to go into another room with you to look at your loaded gun with the safety off. Could you point out right at me so I can get a good look at it?”

He treated his gun like a toy and his daughter paid for his childish attitude with her life.

That’s not manslaughter?

“I know we just had a fight and you went to another room to be alone, but check out my cool new gun that is loaded with the safety off and pointed in your direction!”

JFC.

Multiple people can be at fault

In order for it to be manslaughter you’d have to consider the victim a person.

In today’s episode of “Thing ‘Conservatives’ warned would happen, happens. Conservatives shocked…”

Reminds me of a video where a guy was freaking out because magnets would stick to his arm. Comments said ‘put some talcum powder on your arm and try again’ so he did; magically the magnets wouldn’t stick anymore…

“Nobody could have seen this coming” said about an event that everyone else saw coming still doesn’t make me very sympathetic.

The only moral immigrant worker is my immigrant worker.

Thing Conservatives were warned was going to happen, happens. Conservatives shocked: “who could have seen this coming?”

It’s their fault, not hers, and definitely not the DNC’s

All of them are at fault.