Yes. Personalized pricing relies on harvesting data. Don’t get played. Hackers and scammers rely on getting data on you. Don’t give it to them.
And everyone has something to hide. Do you have cancer? An STD? An affair? Those are all legal, but depending on the circumstances, you might get fucked if the whole town knew. Protect your data.
Oh, my dear, if it’s the same, why do internal messages at Instagram and other such companies describe it differently? They know that they can tweak the algorithm to manipulate people, and especially children, into overusing their system. You can argue with us, but it gets absurd if you’re trying to argue that they don’t know what their own data tells them.
TV can’t do that. You turn on the channel or you don’t, that’s it. There’s no real time individual manipulation. Of course TV execs wish they had that power, but they don’t, so they didn’t get sued.
Now, is it actually addiction? That’s an interesting question. Some experts say no.
The data disagrees with you, though.
If only the corporate Dems were actually on the good side… Sigh.
And the garbage takes itself out, marvelous.
No, it didn’t conclude that. It claimed it, which is different.
Oh my friend, you can replace open source with AI. You can do it, especially if you don’t care about the consequences…
Look, the story is full of deceit. If crimes were committed, they would have called the cops, right? Or posted pictures and video. Of course they would have … unless the perpetrators were rich Japanese folk. This is common sense.
No, they got it wrong. It was me! I am the leader! Don’t believe the feds, those lying pigs.
Most? Well that’s a nice claim. I wonder if it’s true. Kinda think not. Kinda think passiveness was more common.
Oh there you go again. Keep blaming the people for not voting for a candidate with weak values. It’s their fault, not hers, and definitely not the DNC’s. Will you blame them again in 2028, just like you did in 2016 and 2024? Or will you go get a decent candidate?
No. It is not clear. I read books and train myself from them, and then teach others for money. That’s legal… Obviously computers are not humans, but the parallel is there. So it’s not clear what the law is or ought to be.
That’s true but don’t fool yourself. There are younger dirty politicians waiting to replace them if we aren’t careful, and probably in some places even if we are.
Yeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhh!
The way to do that now is to send them abroad to disappear or die. That’s the deflection. Otherwise there are dead bodies in the US and state murder charges with no statute of limitations.
Not true, though. We already have videos of people threatening to use 2A if ICE breaks in, and then of ICE leaving… In other words, you can scare them off. Do you think the average ICE agent wants to risk their own life to fuck someone up? No, of course not. They want to risk another ICE agent’s life, not their own.
And how many people know or care what C does for them, anyway. It’s cool, though.
She was working for them, knowing they were evil, and happily getting a paycheck. But she knew that the judge would eventually regulate things, starting with her. You can get only stonewall for so long, before you either quit or start lying.
Shit, we don’t know, but did she already lie and was worried that it would be uncovered? Wouldn’t surprise me.
And with them, the entire US tech economy… Of course Europe would get going quickly enough, whereas US tech would never recover… So it’s an interesting kind of leverage to disfigure oneself.
You can call them that if you’re painting a positive picture of the future, like encouraging them because soon enough they’ll be voting. That’s a reasonable time to do so.
If you do so here, when the whole point is there were massive horrible crimes on kids committed, you’re covering up the badness.
Have you ever read the essay entitled “Who Goes Nazi?”
In the end, when people are dying like they are now, they don’t really care who are white supremacists and who are cheerleading the white supremacists. If you vote for a corporate Democrat who votes to fund ICE, I guessthat’s better than voting for Donald Trump. But it’s not going to help people who are in death camps or people who already died or families that have been torn apart.
Sometimes voting for the second worst candidate isn’t good enough. Sometimes you need to do a lot more if you want to live your life with dignity and decency. Unfortunately, posts like this are designed to oversimplify life and convince people to give up. But I think that’s a load of bullshit. I think we can do better, and it all starts from recognizing that the Democrats are not going to save us unless we force them to.
It’s easy to blame the people who stayed home and it’s hard to take responsibility for your own potential.